Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine
Volume 2, Issue 1 , Pages 37-41 , March 2006

Electrospun bioscaffolds that mimic the topology of extracellular matrix

Received 24 September 2005 ,Accepted 9 January 2006.

References 

  1. Badylak SF. The extracellular matrix as a scaffold for tissue reconstruction. Cell Dev Biol. 2002;13:377–383
  2. Berthiaume F, Moghe PV, Toner M, Yarmush ML. Effect of extracellular matrix topology on cell structure, function, and physiological responsiveness: hepatocytes cultured in a sandwich configuration. FASEB J. 1996;10:1471–1484
  3. Skalak R, Fox CF ML. Tissue engineering. UCLA Symposia on Molecular and Cellular Biology, New Series, Vol. 107. In: New York: Alan R. Liss, Inc; 1998;p. 1471–1484
  4. Kim B-S, Mooney DJ. Development of biocompatible synthetic extracellular matrices for tissue engineering. Trends Biotechnol. 2001;16:224–230
  5. Griffith LG. Emerging design principles in biomaterials and scaffolds for tissue engineering. Reparative medicine: growing tissues and organs. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002;961:83–95
  6. Cooper GM. The cell: a molecular approach. In: Washington, DC: ASM Press, Sinauer Associates; 1997;p. 1–9
  7. Antucci RA, Barber TD. Resorbable extracellular matrix grafts in urologic reconstruction. Int Braz J Urol. 2005;31(3):192–203
  8. Hodde JP, Record RD, Tullius RS, Badylak SF. Retention of endothelial cell adherence to porcine-derived extracellular matrix after disinfection and sterilization. Tissue Eng. 2002;8(2):225–234
  9. Knapp PM, Lingeman JE, Siegel YI, Badylak SF, Demeter RJ. Biocompatibility of small-intestinal submucosa in urinary tract as augmentation cystoplasty graft and injectable suspension. J Endourol. 1994;8(2):125–130
  10. Colvert JR, Kropp BP, Cheng EY, Pope JC, Brock JW, Adams MC, et al. The use of small intestinal submucosa as an off-the-shelf urethral sling material for pediatric urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2002;168(4):1872–1876[Suppl]
  11. Badylak SF. Extracellular matrix as a scaffold for tissue engineering in veterinary medicine: applications to soft tissue healing. Clin Tech Equine Pract. 2004;3:173–181
  12. Han D, Goldgraben S, Frame MD, Gouma PI. A novel nanofiber scaffold by electrospinning and its utility in microvascular tissue engineering. In: Proceedings of Symposium on “Nanoscale Materials Science in Biology and Medicine,” CT. Laurencin and E.A. Botchwey, eds. Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings Volume 845. Warrendale, PA, 2005, pp. AA5.48. 2005;
  13. Kennedy JF, Phillips GO, Wedlock DJ, Williams PA. Cellulose and its derivatives: chemistry, biochemistry and applications. New York: Halsted Press; 1985;
  14. Entcheva E, Bien H, Yin L, Chiung-Yin Chung C-Y, Farrell M, Kostov Y. Functional cardiac cell constructs on cellulose-based scaffolding. Biomaterials. 2004;25:5753–5762
  15. Martson M, Viljanto J, Hurme T, Laippala P, Saukko P. Is cellulose sponge degradable or stable as implantation material? An in vivo subcutaneous study in the rat. Biomaterials. 1999;20:1989–1995
  16. Demir MM, Yilgor I, Yilgor E, Erman B. Electrospinning of polyurethane fibers. Polymer. 2002;43:3303–3309
  17. Shin YM, Hohman MM, Brenner MP, Rutledge GC. Experimental characterization of electrospinning: the electrically forced jet and instabilities. Polymer. 2001;42:9955–9967
  18. Wang M, Singh H, Hatton TA, Rutledge GC. Field-responsive superparamagnetic composite nanofibers by electrospinning. Polymer. 2004;45:5505–5514
  19. Doshi J, Reneker DH. Electrospinning process and application of electrospun fibers. J Electrost. 1995;35:151–160
  20. Fong H, Chun I, Reneker DH. Beaded nanofibers formed during electrospinning. Polymer. 1999;40:4585–4592
  21. Sipe JD. Tissue engineering and reparative medicine. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002;961:1–9

PII: S1549-9634(06)00008-6

doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2006.01.002

Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine
Volume 2, Issue 1 , Pages 37-41 , March 2006

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution