Next »
Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine
Volume 5, Issue 4
, Pages
369-377
, December 2009
Nanoparticles as drug delivery agents specific for CNS: in vivo biodistribution
-
PCS analysis: histogram of size distribution by intensity of a representative sample of Rh-123-loaded peptide-modified NPs (Rh-123-M-NP), Rh-123–loaded unmodified NPs (Rh-123-B-NP), and loperamide-loa
PCS analysis: histogram of size distribution by intensity of a representative sample of Rh-123-loaded peptide-modified NPs (Rh-123-M-NP), Rh-123–loaded unmodified NPs (Rh-123-B-NP), and loperamide-loaded peptide-modified NPs (Lop-M-NP).
-
In vitro release of loperamide (◊, gray line) and Rh-123 (▪, broken black line) from peptidide-modified NPs performed in pH 7.4 buffered solution. Each value is the mean of at least three experiments.In vitro release of loperamide (◊, gray line) and Rh-123 (▪, broken black line) from peptidide-modified NPs performed in pH 7.4 buffered solution. Each value is the mean of at least three experiments.
-
(A) Antinociceptive effect exerted by the ICV administration of loperamide (square) in comparison with the effect exerted by loperamide loaded in the peptide-modified NPs (Lop-M-NP) (triangle). (B) An(A) Antinociceptive effect exerted by the ICV administration of loperamide (square) in comparison with the effect exerted by loperamide loaded in the peptide-modified NPs (Lop-M-NP) (triangle). (B) Antinociceptive effect exerted by loperamide ICV administration at different dosages. Data are presented as mean of at least three experiments ± SEM (bars) and were analyzed by means of ANOVA followed by Student-Neuman-Keuls tests for multiple comparisons. At each time point every group is significantly (at least P < .05) different from the other groups; some exceptions were recognized, namely: at 1 hour, control group vs 5 μg and 40 μg vs 20 μg; at 1.5 hours 20 μg vs 10 μg and 0 μg vs 5 μg; at 2 hours, control vs 5 μg, control vs 10 μg, 5 μg vs 10 μg, and 20 μg vs 40 μg. MPE, maximum possible effect.
-
Biodistribution results of Rh-123–loaded peptide-modified NPs (Rh-123-M-NP) (black) in comparison with Rh-123–loaded unmodified NPs (Rh-123-B-NP) (white). Each value is the mean of at least three expeBiodistribution results of Rh-123–loaded peptide-modified NPs (Rh-123-M-NP) (black) in comparison with Rh-123–loaded unmodified NPs (Rh-123-B-NP) (white). Each value is the mean of at least three experiments. *P < .05 (Student's test) Rh-123-M-NP vs Rh-123-B-NP.
No conflict of interest was reported by the authors of this paper.
PII: S1549-9634(09)00059-8
doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2009.02.005
© 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Next »
Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine
Volume 5, Issue 4
, Pages
369-377
, December 2009
