Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine
Volume 6, Issue 1 , Pages 44-51 , February 2010

The role of surface energy of technical polymers in serum protein adsorption and MG-63 cells adhesion

  • Jordi Comelles, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Nanobioengineering Group, Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC), Barcelona, Spain
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author:
  • ,
  • Maruxa Estévez, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Nanobioengineering Group, Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC), Barcelona, Spain
    • Department of Electronics, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
  • ,
  • Elena Martínez, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Nanobioengineering Group, Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC), Barcelona, Spain
    • Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (CIBER-BBN), Spain
  • ,
  • Josep Samitier, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Nanobioengineering Group, Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC), Barcelona, Spain
    • Department of Electronics, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
    • Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina (CIBER-BBN), Spain

Received 22 December 2008 ,Accepted 14 May 2009.

References 

  1. Lee HG, Gibson K, Lee JH. Polymeric materials. In:  Bronzino J editors. The biomedical engineering handbook. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2000;
  2. Whitesides GM. The origins and the future of microfluidics. Nature. 2006;442:368–373
  3. Curtis A, Wilkinson C. Topographical control of cells. Biomaterials. 1997;18:1573–1583
  4. Mills CA, Escarre J, Engel E, Martinez E, Errachid A, Bertomeu J, et al. Micro-and nanostructuring of poly(ethylene-2,6-naphthalate) surfaces, for biomedical applications, using polymer replication techniques. Nanotechnology. 2005;16:369–375
  5. Engel E, Michiardi A, Navarro M, Lacroix D, Planell JA. Nanotechnology in regenerative medicine: the materials side. Trends Biotechnol. 2008;26:39–47
  6. Martínez E, Engel E, López-Iglesias C, Mills CA, Planell JA, Samitier J. Focused ion beam/scanning electron microscopy characterization of cell behavior on polymer micro-/nanopatterned substrates: a study of cell-substrate interactions. Micron. 2008;39:111–116
  7. Craig RG, Berry GC, Peyton FA. Wetting of poly-(methyl methacrylate) and polystyrene by water and saliva. J Phys Chem. 1960;64:541–543
  8. Toworfe GK, Composto RJ, Adams CS, Shapiro IM, Ducheyne P. Fibronectin adsorption on surface-activated poly(dimethylsiloxane) and its effect on cellular function. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2004;71A:449–461
  9. Peterson SL, McDonald A, Gourley PL, Sasaki DY. Poly(dimethylsiloxane) thin films as biocompatible coatings for microfluidic devices: cell culture and flow studies with glial cells. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2005;72A:10–18
  10. Welle A, Gottwald E. UV-based patterning of polymeric substrates for cell culture applications. Biomed Microdevices. 2002;4:33–41
  11. Patel S, Thakar RG, Wong J, McLeod SD, Li S. Control of cell adhesion on poly(methyl methacrylate). Biomaterials. 2006;27:2890–2897
  12. Browne MM, Lubarsky GV, Davidson MR, Bradley RH. Protein adsorption onto polystyrene surfaces studied by XPS and AFM. Surface Sci. 2004;553:155–167
  13. Williams DF. The Williams dictionary of biomaterials. Liverpool. UK: Liverpool University Press; 1999;
  14. Williams DF. On the mechanisms of biocompatibility. Biomaterials. 2008;29:2941–2953
  15. Alberts BJ, Johnson A, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Walter P. Cell junctions, cell adhesion, and the extracellular matrix. In:  Alberts B editors. Molecular biology of the cell. 4th ed. New York: Garland; 2002;p. 1065–1125
  16. García A. Interfaces to control cell-biomaterial adhesive interactions. In: Polymers for regenerative medicine. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer; 2006;p. 171–190
  17. Kasemo B. Biological surface science. Surface Sci. 2002;500:656–677
  18. Andrade J, Hlady V. Protein adsorption and materials biocompatibility: a tutorial review and suggested hypotheses. In: Biopolymers/Non-Exclusion HPLC. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer; 1986;p. 1–163
  19. Nebe JGB, Luethen F, Lange R, Beck U. Interface interactions of osteoblasts with structured titanium and the correlation between physicochemical characteristics and cell biological parameters. Macromol Biosci. 2007;7:567–578
  20. dos Santos EA, Farina M, Soares GA, Anselme K. Surface energy of hydroxyapatite and ss-tricalcium phosphate ceramics driving serum protein adsorption and osteoblast adhesion. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008;19:2307–2316
  21. Quinn A, Mantz H, Jacobs K, Bellion M, Santen L. Protein adsorption kinetics in different surface potentials. Europhys Lett. 2008;81;56003-pl-6
  22. Risbud MV, Dabhade R, Gangal S, Bhonde RR. Radio-frequency plasma treatment improves the growth and attachment of endothelial cells on poly(methyl methacrylate) substrates: implications in tissue engineering. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2002;13:1067–1080
  23. Horcas I, Fernandez R, Gomez-Rodriguez JM, Colchero J, Gomez-Herrero J, Baro AM. WSXM: a software for scanning probe microscopy and a tool for nanotechnology. Rev Sci Instrum. 2007;013705-8:78
  24. Owens DK, Wendt RC. Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers. J Appl Polym Sci. 1969;13:1741–1747
  25. Viville PL, Lazzaroni R, Brédas JL, Moretti P, Samorí P, Biscarini F. The influence of thermal annealing on the morphology of sexithienyl thin films. Adv Mater. 1998;10:57–60
  26. Vogler EA. Structure and reactivity of water at biomaterial surfaces. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 1998;74:69–117
  27. Kennedy SB, Washburn NR, Simon JCG, Amis EJ. Combinatorial screen of the effect of surface energy on fibronectin-mediated osteoblast adhesion, spreading and proliferation. Biomaterials. 2006;27:3817–3824
  28. Lim JY, Shaughnessy MC, Zhou Z, Noh H, Vogler EA, Donahue HJ. Surface energy effects on osteoblast spatial growth and mineralization. Biomaterials. 2008;29:1776–1784
  29. Cai Y. Newby B-mZ. Dewetting of polystyrene thin films on poly(ethylene glycol)-modified surfaces as a simple approach for patterning proteins. Langmuir. 2008;24:5202–5208
  30. Dufrene YF, Marchal TG, Rouxhet PG. Influence of substratum surface properties on the organization of adsorbed collagen films: in situ characterization by atomic force microscopy. Langmuir. 1999;15:2871–2878
  31. Morin C, Hitchcock AP, Cornelius RM, Brash JL, Urquhart SG, Scholl A, et al. Selective adsorption of protein on polymer surfaces studied by soft X-ray photoemission electron microscopy. J Electron Spectrosc Rel Phenomena. 2004;137-140:785–794
  32. De Bartolo L, Morelli S, Bader A, Drioli E. The influence of polymeric membrane surface free energy on cell metabolic functions. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2001;12:959–963
  33. Michiardi A, Aparicio C, Ratner BD, Planell JA, Gil J. The influence of surface energy on competitive protein adsorption on oxidized NiTi surfaces. Biomaterials. 2007;28:586–594
  34. Redey SA, Nardin M, Bernache-Assolant D, Rey C, Delannoy P, Sedel L, et al. Behavior of human osteoblastic cells on stoichiometric hydroxyapatite and type A carbonate apatite: role of surface energy. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;50:353–364
  35. Wilson CJ, Clegg RE, Leavesley DI, Pearcy MJ. Mediation of biomaterial-cell interactions by adsorbed proteins: a review. Tissue Eng. 2005;11:1–18
  36. Wertz CF, Santore MM. Fibrinogen adsorption on hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces: geometrical and energetic aspects of interfacial relaxations. Langmuir. 2002;18:706–715
  37. Michael KE, Vernekar VN, Keselowsky BG, Meredith JC, Latour RA, Garcia AJ. Adsorption-induced conformational changes in fibronectin due to interactions with well-defined surface chemistries. Langmuir. 2003;19:8033–8040
  38. Stangegaard M, Wang Z, Kutter JP, Dufva M, Wolff A. Whole genome expression profiling using DNA microarray for determining biocompatibility of polymeric surfaces. Mol Biosyst. 2006;2:421–428

PII: S1549-9634(09)00104-X

doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2009.05.006

Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine
Volume 6, Issue 1 , Pages 44-51 , February 2010