Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine
Volume 8, Issue 1 , Pages 93-102 , January 2012

The effects of cancer progression on the viscoelasticity of ovarian cell cytoskeleton structures

  • Alperen N. Ketene, BSc

      Affiliations

    • Department of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
    • VT MEMS Lab, The Bradley Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
  • ,
  • Eva M. Schmelz, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
  • ,
  • Paul C. Roberts, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biomedical Sciences and Pathobiology, Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
  • ,
  • Masoud Agah, PhD

      Affiliations

    • VT MEMS Lab, The Bradley Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: The Bradley Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061.

Received 4 February 2011 ,Accepted 19 May 2011.

References 

  1. Asch BB, Kamat BR, Burstein NA. Interactions of normal, dysplastic, and malignant mammary epithelial cells with fibronectin in vivo and in vitro. J Cancer Res. 1981;41:2115–2125
  2. Chakraborty J, Von Stein GA. Pleomorphism of human prostatic cancer cells (DU 145) in culture—The role of cytoskeleton. Exp Mol Pathol. 1996;44:235–245
  3. Suresh S. Biomechanics and biophysics of cancer cells. Acta Biomaterialia. 2007;3:413–438
  4. Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Walter P. Molecular biology of the cell. 4th ed.. New York: Garland Science; 2002;
  5. Mijailovich SM, Kojic M, Zivkovic M, Fabry B, Fredberg B. A finite element model of cell deformation during magnetic bead twisting. J Appl Physiol. 2002;93:1429–1436
  6. Dao M, Lim CT, Suresh S. Mechanics of the human red blood cell deformed by optical tweezers. J Mech Phys Solids. 2003;51:2259–2280
  7. Gardel ML, Shin JH, MacKintosh FC, Mahadevan L, Matsudaira P, Weitz DA. Elastic behavior of cross-linked and bundled actin networks. Science. 2004;304:1301–1305
  8. Overby DR, Matthews BD, Alsberg E, Ingber DE. Novel dynamic rheological behavior of individual focal adhesions measured within single cells using electromagnetic pulling cytometry. J Acta Biomaterialia. 2005;1:295–303
  9. Binnig G, Quate CF, Gerber C. Atomic force microscope. Phys Rev Letts. 1986;56:930–933
  10. Sokolov I. Atomic force microscopy in cancer cell research. In:  Singh Nalwa H,  Webster T editor. Cancer Nanotechnology. 2007;p. 1–17
  11. Kumar S, Weaver VM. Mechanics, malignancy, and metastatis: the force journey of a tumor cell. J Cancer Metastatis Rev. 2009;28:113–127
  12. Lekka M, Laidler P, Gil D, Lekki J, Stachura Z, Hrynkiewicsm AZ. Elasticity of normal and cancerous human bladder cells studied by scanning force microscopy. Biophysics J. 1999;28:312–316
  13. Faria EC, Ma N, Gazi E, Gardner P, Brown M, Clarke NW, et al. Measurement of elastic properties of prostate cancer cells using AFM. Analyst. 2008;133:1498–1500
  14. Cross SE, Jin Y, Rao J, Gimzewski JK. Nanomechanical analysis of cells from cancer patients. Nat Nanotechnol. 2007;2:780–783
  15. Cross SE, Jin YS, Tondre J, Wong R, Rao JY, Gimzewski JK. AFM-based analysis of human metastatic cancer cells. J Nanotechnol. 2008;19:1–8
  16. Darling EM, Zauscher S, Block JM, Guilak F. A thin-layer model for viscoelastic, stress-relaxation testing of cells using atomic force microscopy: do cell properties reflect metastatic potential. Biophysics J. 2007;92:1784–1791
  17. Rosenbluth MJ, Lam WA, Fletcher DA. Force microscopy of nonadherent cells: a comparison of leukemia cell deformability. Biophysics J. 2006;90:2994–3003
  18. Carl P, Schillers H. Elasticity measurement of living cells with an atomic force microscope: data acquisition and processing. Pflugers Arch-Eur J Physiol. 2008;457:551–559
  19. Nikkhah M, Strobl J, De Vita R, Agah M. The cytoskeletal organization of breast carcinoma and fibroblast cells inside three dimensional (3-D) isotropic silicon microstructures. Biomaterials. 2010;31:1–10
  20. Jemal AD, Siegel RM, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer Statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60:1–24
  21. Roberts PC, Motillo E, Baxa AC, Heng HHQ, Doyon-Reale N, Gregoire L, et al. Sequential molecular and cellular events during neoplastic progression: a mouse syngeneic ovarian cancer model. Neoplasia. 2005;7:944–956
  22. Creekmore AL, Silkworth WT, Cimini D, Jensen R, Roberts PC, Schmelz EM. Changes in gene expression and cellular organization in a model of progressive ovarian cancer. PLoSOne. 2011;6:1–16
  23. Janovjak H, Struckmeier J, Muller DJ. Hydrodynamic effects in fast AFM single-molecule force measurements. Eur Biophys J. 2005;34:91–96
  24. Lu YB, Franze K, Steinhauser C, Kirchhoff F, Wolburg H, Guck J, et al. Viscoelastic properties of individual glial cells and neurons in the CNS. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:17759–17764
  25. Mathur AB, Collinsworth AM, Reichert WM, Kraus WE, Truskey GA. Endothelial, cardiac muscle and skeletal muscle exhibit different viscous and elastic properties as determined by atomic force microscopy. J Biomechanics. 2001;34:1545–1553
  26. Timoshenko SP, Goodier JN. Theory of elasticity. 3rd ed.. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1970;
  27. Hertz H. On the elastic contact of elastic solids. Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik. 1881;92:156–171
  28. Sneddon IN. The relation between load and penetration in the axisymmetric Boussinesq problem for a punch of arbitrary profile. Int J Eng Sci. 1965;3:47–57
  29. Kuznetsova TG, Starodubtseva MN, Yegorenkov NI, Chizhik SA, Zhdanov RI. Atomic force microscopy probing of cell elasticity. J Micron. 2007;38:824–833
  30. Ketene AN, Schmelz EM, Roberts PC, Creekmore AL, Nikkhah M, Agah M. In: Distinct biomechanical characteristics of mouse ovarian cells as a marker for cancer detection, in 1st International Conference on Applied Bionics and Biomechanics(ICABB), Venice, Italy. 2010;
  31. Rico F, Roca-Cusachs P, Gavara N, Farre R, Rotger M, Navajas D. Probing mechanical properties of living cells by atomic force microscopy with blunted pyramidal cantilever tips. J Phys Rev E. 2005;72:1–10
  32. Sen S, Subramanian S, Discher DE. Indentation and adhesive probing of a cell membrane with AFM: theoretical model and experiments. Biophysics J. 2005;89:3203–3213
  33. Domke J, Radmacher M. Measuring the elastic properties of thin polymer films with the atomic force microscope. Langmuir. 1998;14:3320–3325
  34. Darling EM, Topel M, Zauscher S, Vail TP, Guilak F. Viscoelastic properties of human mesenchymally-derived stem cells and primary osteoblasts, chondrocytes, and adipocytes. J Biomech. 2008;41:454–464
  35. Guo SL, Akhremitchev BB. Packing density and structural heterogeneity of insulin fibrils by AFM nanoindentation. Biomacromolecules. 2006;7:1630–1636
  36. Meyers MA, Chawla KK. Mechanical behavior of materials. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 1998;
  37. Rotsch C, Radmacher M. Drug-induced changes of cytoskeletal structure and mechanics in fibroblasts - an atomic force microscopy study. Biophysics J. 2000;78:520–535
  38. Zhu C, Bao G, Wang N. Cell mechanics: mechanical response, cell adhesion, and molecular deformation. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2000;2:189–226
  39. Lindberg U, Karlsson R, Lassing I, Schutt CE, Hoglund AS. The microfilament system and malignancy. Semin Cancer Biol. 2008;18:2–11
  40. Buda A, Pignatelli M. Cytoskeletal network in colon cancer: from genes to clinical application. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2004;36:759–765
  41. Haga H, Nagayama M, Kazushige K. Imaging mechanical properties of living cells by scanning probe microscopy. Curr Nanosci. 2007;3:97–103
  42. Pelling AE, Dawson DW, Carreon DM, Christiansen JJ, Shen RR, Teitell MA, et al. Distinct contributions of microtubule subtypes to cell membrane shape and stability. Nanomedicine. 2007;3:43–52
  43. Tsai MA, Waugh RE, Keng PC. Passive mechanical behavior of human neutrophils: effects of colchicine and paclitaxel. Biophysics J. 1998;74:3282–3291
  44. Weihs D, Mason TG, Teitell MA. Bio-microrheology: a frontier in microrheology. Biophysics J. 2006;91
  45. Janmey PA, Euteneuer U, Traub P, Schliwa M. Viscoelastic properties of vimentin compared with other filamentous biopolymer networks. J Cell Biol. 1991;113:155–160
  46. Bray D, movements Cell. from molecules to motility. 2nd ed.. New York: Garland; 2000;
  47. Wyckoff JB, Jones JG, Condeelis JS, Segall JE. A critical step in metastatis: in vivo analysis of intravasation at the primary tumor. Cancer Res. 2000;60:2504–2511
  48. Shah-Yukovich EM, Nelson AC. Characterization of solid tumor microvasculature: a three-dimensional analysis using the polymer casting technique. Lab Invest. 1988;58:236–244
  49. Li QS, Lee GYH, Ong CN, Lim CT. AFM indentation study of breast cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;374:609–613
  50. Zhao M, Srinivasan C, Burgess D, Huey B. Rate- and depth-dependent nanomechanical behavior of individual licing chinese hamster ovary cells probed by atomic force microscopy. J Mater Res. 2006;21:1906–1912

 Conflict of interest: No conflict of interest was reported by the authors of this paper.

 E.M.S. and P.C.R. are supported in part by NIH/NCI CA118846. This study was made possible by the support of the National Science Foundation (NSF) Award No. ECCS-IDR 0925945 as well as the Institute for Critical Technology and Applied Science (ICTAS).

PII: S1549-9634(11)00184-5

doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2011.05.012

Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine
Volume 8, Issue 1 , Pages 93-102 , January 2012