Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine
Volume 8, Issue 2 , Pages 136-146 , February 2012

Gadolinium metallofullerenol nanoparticles inhibit cancer metastasis through matrix metalloproteinase inhibition: imprisoning instead of poisoning cancer cells

  • Huan Meng, PhD

      Affiliations

    • CAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials & Nanosafety, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100049, and National Center for Nanosciences and Technology of China, Beijing China
    • These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • ,
  • Gengmei Xing, PhD

      Affiliations

    • CAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials & Nanosafety, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100049, and National Center for Nanosciences and Technology of China, Beijing China
    • These authors contributed equally to this work.
  • ,
  • Elvin Blanco, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nanomedicine, The Methodist Hospital Research Institute, Houston, Texas, USA
  • ,
  • Yan Song, BS

      Affiliations

    • CAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials & Nanosafety, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100049, and National Center for Nanosciences and Technology of China, Beijing China
  • ,
  • Lina Zhao, PhD

      Affiliations

    • CAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials & Nanosafety, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100049, and National Center for Nanosciences and Technology of China, Beijing China
  • ,
  • Baoyun Sun, PhD

      Affiliations

    • CAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials & Nanosafety, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100049, and National Center for Nanosciences and Technology of China, Beijing China
  • ,
  • Xiaoda Li, MS

      Affiliations

    • CAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials & Nanosafety, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100049, and National Center for Nanosciences and Technology of China, Beijing China
  • ,
  • Paul C. Wang, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Howard University, Washington, DC, USA
  • ,
  • Alexandru Korotcov, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Howard University, Washington, DC, USA
  • ,
  • Wei Li, PhD

      Affiliations

    • CAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials & Nanosafety, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100049, and National Center for Nanosciences and Technology of China, Beijing China
  • ,
  • Xing-Jie Liang, PhD

      Affiliations

    • CAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials & Nanosafety, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100049, and National Center for Nanosciences and Technology of China, Beijing China
  • ,
  • Chunying Chen, PhD

      Affiliations

    • CAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials & Nanosafety, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100049, and National Center for Nanosciences and Technology of China, Beijing China
  • ,
  • Hui Yuan, MS

      Affiliations

    • CAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials & Nanosafety, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100049, and National Center for Nanosciences and Technology of China, Beijing China
  • ,
  • Feng Zhao, MS

      Affiliations

    • CAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials & Nanosafety, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100049, and National Center for Nanosciences and Technology of China, Beijing China
  • ,
  • Zhen Chen, PhD

      Affiliations

    • CAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials & Nanosafety, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100049, and National Center for Nanosciences and Technology of China, Beijing China
  • ,
  • Tong Sun, MS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nanomedicine, The Methodist Hospital Research Institute, Houston, Texas, USA
  • ,
  • Zhifang Chai, PhD

      Affiliations

    • CAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials & Nanosafety, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100049, and National Center for Nanosciences and Technology of China, Beijing China
  • ,
  • Mauro Ferrari, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Nanomedicine, The Methodist Hospital Research Institute, Houston, Texas, USA
  • ,
  • Yuliang Zhao, PhD

      Affiliations

    • CAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials & Nanosafety, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Beijing 100049, and National Center for Nanosciences and Technology of China, Beijing China
    • Research Center for Cancer Nanotechnology, Tianjin Cancer Hospital and Chinese Academy of Sciences, Tianjin, China
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: CAS Key Laboratory for Biomedical Effects of Nanomaterials & Nanosafety, Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and National Center for Nanosciences and Technology of China, Beijing, China.

Received 10 May 2011 ,Accepted 28 August 2011.

  • Image Result

    Synthesis and characterization of Gd@C82(OH)22 nanoparticles (f-NPs). (A) The hydroxyl-functionalized Gd@C82 nanoparticles were purified by Sephadex G-25 column chromatography with an eluent of distil

    Synthesis and characterization of Gd@C82(OH)22 nanoparticles (f-NPs). (A) The hydroxyl-functionalized Gd@C82 nanoparticles were purified by Sephadex G-25 column chromatography with an eluent of distilled water. TEM image shows the morphology of f-NPs. Scale bar, 50 nm. (B) Size distributions, average sizes (first value in parentheses), and zeta potentials of f-NPs (second value in parentheses) in different physiological aqueous solutions were analyzed. (C) Stability of f-NPs in physiological solution was determined by transparency check, DLS, and ICP-MS analysis. f-NPs were suspended in saline with or without mouse serum (w/w, 1%) at 100 μg/mL and sonicated for 10 minutes before the measurement. Particle size measurements were conducted using DLS from 0 to 6 days. Photographs of f-NPs in saline were taken at 0 and 6 days. To determine whether Gd3+ ions could be released from the carbon cage, dialysis experiments were performed. The dialysis bags contained 5 mL f-NPs suspension at particle dose of 100 μg/mL, which was dialyzed against 200 mL saline with or without serum. Gd content in dialysis bags were measured at 0 and 6 days by ICP-MS.

  • Image Result
    Study of the effects of f-NPs on MMP regulation and cancer cell invasion in vitro. (A) qPCR (histogram) and western blotting (insert) were used to study the level of MMP-9 and MMP-2 in U937 cells trea

    Study of the effects of f-NPs on MMP regulation and cancer cell invasion in vitro. (A) qPCR (histogram) and western blotting (insert) were used to study the level of MMP-9 and MMP-2 in U937 cells treated with f-NPs at various concentrations. P < 0.05, compared to control. (B) qPCR (histogram) and western blotting (insert) were used to determine MMP-9 and MMP-2 levels in MDA-MB-231/U937 co-cultured system in the presence of f-NPs at indicated concentrations. P < 0.05, compared to control. (C) To study the effect of f-NPs on cancer cell invasion, the GFP-labeled cancer cells that were able to pass through the Matrigel-coated membranes toward serum-containing medium (chemoattractant) were detected. PMA-, caffeine-, and small-molecule MMP inhibitors (CP 471474, CID 10667540)–treated cells were included in the assay. Nontreated cells were considered as 100% in the calculation of the invasion index. P < 0.05, significantly lower compared to control; #P < 0.05, significantly higher compared to non-treated cells.

  • Image Result
    The f-NPs potently inhibited tumor metastasis in the tissue invasion animal model. (A) Representative bioluminescence images (BLI) of tumor foci obtained from control (left) and the f-NPs–treated anim

    The f-NPs potently inhibited tumor metastasis in the tissue invasion animal model. (A) Representative bioluminescence images (BLI) of tumor foci obtained from control (left) and the f-NPs–treated animals (right) after the course of treatment. (B) Quantification of the bioluminescence intensity of tumor foci in the lungs of animals after the course of treatment. f-NPs treatment significantly inhibited tumor metastasis with an RM = 78% in the tissue invasion model. P < 0.05, compared with saline control. (C) The levels of MMP-9 and MMP-2 in the primary tumor tissues treated with f-NPs or saline were determined by qPCR (histogram) and western blotting (insert). P < 0.05, compared to control.

  • Image Result
    Photomicrographs of histological slides of excised tumors using Van Gieson staining to differentiate collagen fibers at tumor site in control and f-NPs–treated animals, respectively. (A) The excised t

    Photomicrographs of histological slides of excised tumors using Van Gieson staining to differentiate collagen fibers at tumor site in control and f-NPs–treated animals, respectively. (A) The excised tumors of the control mice and (B) of the f-NPs–treated mice of MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer model. (C) The excised tumors of the control mice and (D) of the f-NPs–treated mice of another human breast cancer model, MCF-7. The dotted line represents the boundary between the tumor and its fibrous capsule. The average thicknesses of fibrous capsules on the tumors in the f-NPs–treated group were 7–18 times larger than those of the control depending on tumor type.

  • Image Result
    f-NPs potently inhibited the establishment of tumor foci in the blood transfer model of MDA-MB-231-luc cancer mice. (A) MDA-MB-231-luc cells were harvested and resuspended at a concentration of 1 × 10

    f-NPs potently inhibited the establishment of tumor foci in the blood transfer model of MDA-MB-231-luc cancer mice. (A) MDA-MB-231-luc cells were harvested and resuspended at a concentration of 1 × 107 cells/mL in saline. A 0.1-mL cell suspension was injected into the tail vein of the nude mice. Seven days after cancer cell injection, the mice received daily intraperitoneal doses of the f-NPs at 2.5 μmol/kg for a duration of 6 weeks. Saline was used as control. Tumor metastases in lung were monitored weekly by BLI. (B) Quantification of the BLI intensity of tumor foci in the lungs of animals after different treatments. f-NPs treatment significantly inhibited tumor metastasis with an RM = 88% in the bloodstream transfer model. P < 0.05, compared to control. (C) Histological examination of the lungs with different treatments was performed. Arrows indicate the tumor foci in a saline-treated animal. Higher magnification images of animal lung are shown in the lower panel.

  • Image Result
    Schematic presentation of possible antimetastasis mechanism of f-NPs. Rather than direct cell killing, the metallofullerenol nanoparticles inhibited tumor metastases mainly through a MMP inhibition pr

    Schematic presentation of possible antimetastasis mechanism of f-NPs. Rather than direct cell killing, the metallofullerenol nanoparticles inhibited tumor metastases mainly through a MMP inhibition process. In the control group (left panel), TAMs-secreted MMP enzymes are able to efficiently degrade the fibrous matrices surrounding tumors and facilitate their invasiveness. In the nanoparticle-treated group (right panel), f-NPs decreased the production of MMP, subsequently reducing fibrous matrix degradation. The thick fibrous cage may therefore serve as a “prison” that tightly confines the invasive cancer cells within the primary site.

 The authors thank for the support of MOST 973 program (2009CB930204, 2011CB933403, 2010CB934000, 2012CB934000) and CAS Knowledge Innovation Program. This study was partly funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (10875136), and U.S NIH/RCMI/NCRR (2G12RR003048) and DOD (W81XWH-10-1-0767). M.F., T.S., E.B., are grateful for the support of the U.S. DoD Innovator Award (W81XWH-09-1-0212), NIH U54CA143837 and U54CA151668, and the Ernest Cockrell Jr. Distinguished Endowed Chair.

PII: S1549-9634(11)00356-X

doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2011.08.019

Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine
Volume 8, Issue 2 , Pages 136-146 , February 2012