« BackNanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine
Article in Press

Cancer cell response to nanoparticles: criticality and optimality

  • Hirak Kumar Patra, PhD
  • ,
  • Anjan Kr Dasgupta, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author: Department of Biochemistry, University of Calcutta, 35 Ballygunge Circular Road, Kolkata, 700019, India.

Received 10 October 2011; accepted 24 October 2011. published online 16 November 2011.
Corrected Proof

Abstract 

A stochastic variation in size and electrical parameters is common in nanoparticles. Synthesizing gold nanoparticles with a varying range of size and zeta potential, we show that there is clustering at certain regions of hydrodynamic diameter and zeta potentials that can be classified using k-clustering technique. A cluster boundary was observed around 50 nm, a size known for its optimal response to cells. However, neither size nor zeta potential alone determined the optimal cellular response (e.g., percentage cell survival) induced by such nanoparticles. A complex interplay prevails between size, zeta potential, nature of surface functionalization, and extent of adhesion of the cell to a solid matrix. However, it follows that the ratio of zeta potential to surface area, which scales as the electrical field (by Gaussian law), serves as an appropriate indicator for optimal cellular response. The phase plot spanned by fractional survival and effective electric field (charge density) indicates a positive correlation between mean cell survival and the magnitude of the electric field. The phase plot spanned by fractional survival and effective electric field (charge density) associated with the nanosurface shows a bifurcation behavior. Wide variation of cell survival response is observed at certain critical values of the surface charge density, whereas in other ranges the cellular response is well behaved and more predictable. Existence of phase points near the critical region corresponds to wide fluctuation of nanoparticle-induced response, for small changes in the nanosurface property. Smaller nanoparticles with low zeta potential (e.g., those conjugated with arginine) can have such an attribute (i.e., higher electrical field strength), and eventually they cause more cell death. The study may help in optimal design of nanodrugs.

Graphical Abstract 

A stochastic variation found in wet-route synthesis of nanoparticles, clustering occurs at certain regions of effective electric field (charge density) associated with the nanosurface, showing a series of distinct clusters that grow in size with increase in the field strength. Particles with lower zeta potential and smaller nanoparticles correspond to the smallest cluster, and this condition seems suitable for optimal cytotoxicity behavior. In the presence of a smaller field one finds larger clusters, implying a bi-stable survival behavior with small fluctuations in nanosurface resulting in large fluctuations in cell survival response.

Key words: Nanoparticles, Optimality, Zeta potential, Hydrodynamic size, Cancer cell response

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The authors acknowledge DST Nano Mission and ICMR (BMS/Nano) for funding the project.

PII: S1549-9634(11)00515-6

doi:10.1016/j.nano.2011.10.009

« BackNanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine